Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Press Release - Criminal Bar Association

  1. #1

    Press Release - Criminal Bar Association

    NZ Police Corruption Association (NZPCA) is calling on members of the Criminal Bar
    Association to stand up and be counted.

    For years lawyers working in the criminal jurisdiction have been complaining long
    and loud about the Independent Police Conduct Authority’s (IPCA) inability or
    unwillingness to distance itself from police, resulting in numerous deficiencies in
    their investigation process that inevitably leads them to side with police. Often
    this occurs in defiance of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

    NZPCA believes that the entire structure and “investigative” process followed by the
    IPCA is flawed. The IPCA’s methodology and personnel is openly biased to favour
    police.

    One need only look at the position the IPCA took when asked to investigate multiple
    and systemic failures in the Teina Pora case. If ever there was a police
    investigation that needed to be vigorously investigated it is this one. Its entire
    history smacks of police corruption from enquiry head Rutherford down. Yet the
    IPCA’s immediate response is refusal and their reasoning behind that is so unsound
    as to be blatantly protective of police.

    So where does the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) come in to this? It is all well
    and good their members complaining about the IPCA’s overt bias toward police and
    their numerous deficient investigations. NZPCA believes that the time has come for
    CBA members to pool their collective skills and bring judicial review proceedings
    against the IPCA.

    After decades of police bias it is time to finally make the IPCA accountable and
    lift the veil of secrecy under which they operate, a legacy that advantages only the
    police and leaves hundreds of dissatisfied and frustrated complainants throughout
    the country.

    It is just as well that the IPCA’s performance is not independently audited for in
    any other regime they would have long ago been brought in to line.

  2. #2

    IPCA is perpetrator of a fraud in many investigations

    We have become aware of numerous cases where the Independent Police Conduct Authority has blatantly covered up corruption, commonly dismissing complaints of police misconduct after an "investigation" which fails to talk to any of the non-police witnesses.

    When complainants complain about these IPCA investigations which failed to include talking to witnesses, the IPCA responds with a statement that completed investigations cannot be reopened.

    Innocence Project recommends victims of police misconduct who are confronted with this evasive treatment by the IPCA get their witnesses to swear affidavits that they were never contacted by the IPCA as part of their investigation and use these to support a complaint against the IPCA investigative officer. Several dismissed investigations have been reopened using this tactic despite the IPCA position that completed investigations cannot be.

    The IPCA still finds a way to cover up for the corrupt cop but proving their initial investigation to be a farce for not talking to witnesses has the effect of showing the IPCA stands for "Independent Police Cover-up Authority"

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •