Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Barrister Barry Hart struck off

  1. #1

    Barrister Barry Hart struck off

    High profile lawyer Barry Hart has been struck off from the legal profession.The Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal today decided to strike off the controversial lawyer, who has been mired in legal trouble.Last month,...


  2. #2
    The mind boggles. According to the Herald article above, Hart was struck off by Judge Clarkson. I wonder whether this the same Judge Clarkson whose contraventions of the rule of law were so drastic that it was the final straw that caused our family to flee NZ in terror?
    Last edited by "Frank"; 15-09-2012 at 08:31 PM.

  3. #3
    The Law Society (evidence held against them) condones the named lawyers R Parmenter, P Macky, S Wyness, W (Bill) Patterson, G Pollak, P Wicks, N Birdsey in their breaking of the LCCCR legislation to aid and abet defrauding a legal family trust deed. Peter Macky (Auckland) the ring leader. Added to this H Bouchier the LCRO champions P Macky and partakers in his deceit. She misuses the Crown Stamp in attempt to endorse the abetting of this fraud. The heavy hand from the Law Society clamps down on Mr Hart while the hypocrisy of the Standards Committee 3 Law Society whitewashes and so partakes to aid and abet trust fraud. This is what is called hypocrisy and Mr Hart should be made aware that this two-timing of the Law Society, the heavy hand against him, in comparison with the abetting of Standards Committee 3 (David Chisholm, Stewart Germann, Greg Blanchard, Alan Webb, Maria Dew, Steve Antunovich, Glenn Teal) with the knowledge of Jonathan Temm to cover up for these named lawyers (above) is what is called corrupt disparity against Mr Hart when a band of lawyers violate the LCCCRs and get pampered for it. All strong substantive evidence is held. For example amongst many others, G Pollak stood up at an interlocutory hearing in the Auckland High Court and stated a malicious lie to deceive made by P Macky and his accomplices who instructed G Pollak to falsely state that a Final Beneficiary was a stranger of the family trust which is total deception so as to cheat entitlement. When subsequently faced with what he had done after I got evidence of the lie, Pollak replied he was "under instructions" to say it, which is Peter Macky and Raymond Parmenter's dishonest instructions. In comes Raymond Parmenter later who stated his "joy and pleasure" calling G Pollak a "clever chap" after having pulled their fraud. Also, Parmenter emailed to G Pollak stating "so that Mr Pollak does not receive further unwanted correspondence from you I have suggested that he consign your address to junk mail". P Macky prepared the Trust Deed and has known all along that I am an absolute final beneficiary of my sister's family trust and he deliberately calculated to deceive me for dishonest assistance to his clients (the trustees) who have stolen my entitlement greater than $100,000.00 in Trust Property. His clients are using the Trust Property as a "bach" for themselves and have never managed the Trust as a prudent investment and have mixed Trust money with their personal bank accounts, and have made a sham trust for themselves behind the final beneficiary's back without consultation in an attempt to push out and cheat an absolute final beneficiary. In conflict of interest Peter Macky has betrayed his client the settlor and instead given dishonest assistance to his other clients the trustees so as to defraud the final beneficiary of her entitlement which is protected in the terms of the Trust Deed which is legally binding in Trust Law under the Trustee Act 1956. Mr Hart needs to know what is going on with the Law Society flourishing favours to other lawyers for dishonest acts and violation of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 and Trust Law. Mr Temm, President of the New Zealand Law Society, has been written to an he's not interested and won't raise his little finger, and it was asked why are you speaking publicly in a newspaper against Mr Hart on behalf of the Law Society when you don't raise a finger to dishonest lawyers in this other case. It is clear that Mr Hart is being used as a scapegoat for the appearance that the Law Society is doing something when in fact the Law Society has corrupt double-standards, proof held. These dishonest lawyers also intentionally dishonestly lapsed my legal caveat over the family trust property when they knew I am a absolute final beneficiary and they hide behind malicious silence when they have been found out. They are still stealing my entitlement and this case is currently dangling in the Auckland High Court all because of the corrupt collusion between recalciitrant biased judges in breach of rule 1.2 of the High Court Rules, Trust Law, LCCCRs and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and Crimes Act 1961 on Deception, and these lawyers dishonest interference and deception against trust final beneficiary entitlement. The LCCCRs prohibit lawyers from advising a client to engage in conduct, or assist any person with any fraudulent or criminal activity. The cover sheet of the Trust Deed proves that P Macky has known all along I am a final beneficiary and his own signature on the Trust Deed exposes him. There is definitely indeed double-standard, disparity, duplicity, hypocrisy, favours, against the Principles of the Rule of Law, and these are being exercised out by the Law Society and its Committee who hypocritically haul up Mr Hart yet hand out corrupt favours to Peter Macky, Raymond Parmenter, Susan Wyness (at Macky Roberton), William (Bill) Patterson, Garry Pollak, Nicholas Birdsey, Paul Wicks, and the firm of Macky Roberton. A law for one and not for another by obvious two-faced hypocritical beaurocrats on the Law Society who clearly as shown in the case of Mr Hart pick out a scapegoat when they have the urge when it suits them to promote their image, which is hypocrisy, but at the same time turn a blind eye to the other named lawyers dishonesty and grant them largess favours, thus partaking and abetting fraud. My email is


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts