Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Goolsbee family suffered Civil and Human Rights Violations Wrongful imprisonment

  1. #1

    Goolsbee family suffered Civil and Human Rights Violations Wrongful imprisonment

    On 18 June 2007, the Human Rights Council adopted resolution 5/1 entitled “Institution-Building of the United Nations Human Rights Council” by which a new complaint procedure was established to address consistent patterns of gross and reliably attested violations of all human rights and all fundamental freedoms occurring in any part of the world and under any circumstances.
    The complaint procedure addresses communications submitted by individuals, groups, or non-governmental organizations that claim to be victims of human rights violations or that have direct, reliable knowledge of such violations.
    Like the former 1503 procedure, it is confidential, with a view to enhance cooperation with the State concerned. The new complaint procedure has been improved, where necessary, to ensure that the procedure be impartial, objective, efficient, victims-oriented and conducted in a timely manner.
    History of situations considered since the establishment of the complaint procedure
    How does the complaint procedure work?
    Pursuant to paragraph 94 of resolution 5/1, the Chairperson of the Working Group on Communications, together with the Secretariat, undertake an initial screening of communications based on the admissibility criteria set in paragraphs 85 to 88 of resolution 5/1. Manifestly ill-founded and anonymous communications are screened out. Communications not rejected in the initial screening are transmitted to the State concerned to obtain its views on the allegations of violations. Both the author of a communication and the State concerned are informed of the proceedings at each stage.
    Two distinct working groups - the Working Group on Communications and the Working Group on Situations – are responsible, respectively, for examining written communications and bringing consistent patterns of gross and reliably attested violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms to the attention of the Council. (Click in the “in this section” for more information on both Working Groups and the closed meetings of the Council).
    What are the criteria for a communication to be accepted for examination?
    A communication related to a violation of human rights and fundamental freedoms is admissible, provided that:

    • It is not manifestly politically motivated and its object is consistent with the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other applicable instruments in the field of human rights law;
    • It gives a factual description of the alleged violations, including the rights which are alleged to be violated;
    • Its language is not abusive. However, such a communication may be considered if it meets the other criteria for admissibility after deletion of the abusive language;
    • It is submitted by a person or a group of persons claiming to be the victims of violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms, or by any person or group of persons, including non‑governmental organizations, acting in good faith in accordance with the principles of human rights, not resorting to politically motivated stands contrary to the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations and claiming to have direct and reliable knowledge of the violations concerned. Nonetheless, reliably attested communications shall not be inadmissible solely because the knowledge of the individual authors is second-hand, provided that they are accompanied by clear evidence;
    • It is not exclusively based on reports disseminated by mass media;
    • It does not refer to a case that appears to reveal a consistent pattern of gross and reliably attested violations of human rights already being dealt with by a special procedure, a treaty body or other United Nations or similar regional complaints procedure in the field of human rights;
    • Domestic remedies have been exhausted, unless it appears that such remedies would be ineffective or unreasonably prolonged.

    National human rights institutions, established and operating under the Principles Relating to the Status of National Institutions (the Paris Principles), in particular in regard to quasi-judicial competence, may serve as effective means of addressing individual human rights violations.
    How to submit communications?
    Please fill out the complaint procedure form if you consider that your communication meets the abovementioned criteria.
    Where to send communications?
    Communications intended for handling under the Human Rights Council complaint procedure may be addressed to:
    Complaint Procedure Unit
    Human Rights Council Branch
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
    United Nations Office at Geneva
    CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
    Fax: (41 22) 917 90 11
    E-mail: CP@ohchr.org

    According to the ICCPR the Goolsbee family suffered multifarious Civil and Human Rights Violations at many levels as a direct result of their father's False Arrest and Wrongful imprisonment.

    Robert Kee Esq. Director of the Office of Human Rights Proceedings (As of August 2015.
    Goolsbee has taken the New Zealand Government to task in both The High Courts of New Zealand and through the Office of Human Rights Proceedings and is presently prosecuting some (not all) government agents, Crown Law agents, Queen's Counsels (Judges), Cabinet Ministers (members of Prime Minister John Key's cabinet), and various senior staff and Managers within the Department of Corrections.
    Pictured at left here is Robert Kee Esq. Director of the Office of Human Rights Proceedings New Zealand (As of August 2015).
    The Office of Human Rights Proceedings New Zealand has assisted Henry Alfred Goolsbee to process some (not all) of his claims against some (not all) of the individuals responsible for the violations. The Office of Human Rights Proceedings of New Zealand and Human Rights Commissioner are well-trained to avoid attempts at initiating any serious and genuine attempts to bring higher-placed Ministers to account for the more serious violations: especially where the Goolsbee children suffered both Civil and Human Rights violations. The people of New Zealand are well-acquainted with this fact, as literally thousands of complaints lodged with the Office of the Ombudsman, Human Rights Commissioner and Health and Disability Commissioner remain unresolved to date, and continue to be ignored.
    The procedure that Goolsbee is following and the rules of engagement are listed on another page of this website. You can view them here.
    International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (<~~ PDF download available)



    Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, entry into force 23 March 1976, in accordance with Article 49
    PREAMBLE

    The States Parties to the present Covenant,
    Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,
    Recognizing that these rights derive from the inherent dignity of the human person,
    Recognizing that, in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the ideal of free human beings enjoying civil and political freedom and freedom from fear and want can only be achieved if conditions are created whereby everyone may enjoy his civil and political rights, as well as his economic, social and cultural rights,
    Considering the obligation of States under the Charter of the United Nations to promote universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and freedoms,
    Realizing that the individual, having duties to other individuals and to the community to which he belongs, is under a responsibility to strive for the promotion and observance of the rights recognized in the present Covenant,
    Agree upon the following articles:


  2. #2

    Henry Alfred Goolsbee victim of a modern-day witch-hunt

    Pastor Henry Alfred Goolsbee Abp. suffered the consequences of a modern-day witch-hunt, false arrest and was wrongfully imprisoned for over 2 years and 3 months, during which time he lead several Civil Rights and Human Rights protests within the New Zealand Department of Corrections. His wife and children suffered numerous Civil Rights and Human Rights Violations as well. As a successful whistleblower, Goolsbee has insured that numerous investigations are now underway in the High Courts of New Zealand regarding the rampant corruption that currently plagues the New Zealand government and many of its institutions and Ministries. For more information please visit www.goolsbee.net.
    Please see the following (attached PDF), pages 1-3 for a more detailed summary. Click HERE for the ---->Private and Confidential Resume H Alfred Goolsbee 2015 Aug


    Pastor Henry Alfred Goolsbee Abp.




    Current photos as of June and July 2015
    Alfred has followed an Ancient Essene Lifestyle since age 15, has been a vegetarian since age 13; as well as ministering as a self-financing missionary since age 18.
    Alfred condones the traditional Celtic Church practice of supporting the Family Abbey as the primary means of invoking an Essene mode of living (respectful of both Jewish, Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, Tantra and other religious traditions): that is to say, "We teach through example in our homes."
    see-> www.mtdna.wordpress.com (the entire MTDNA website was designed, built and written by Alfred Goolsbee. *mtDNA is inherited solely from the mother. It is the core and only-source of human energetic vitality as a biological function. mtDNA allows the human organism to store energy).
    "H.A. Goolsbee decides to make a movie about his experiences regarding False Arrest and Wrongful Imprisonment in New Zealand. Current photo below as of 07-2015 shows Goolsbee in front of the Director's Association of America in Los Angeles California."


    Student of ancient and biblical history, nano-technologies and physics;

    Alfred was born in 1955, is the father of 6 children who range in age from 10~32 and is married to a Japanese national; he is a practicing soil-scientist, goldsmith, sustainable lifestyle consultant, health-therapist (specializing in preventative medicine), aroma-therapist and a master-craftsman; he and his family enjoy camping, woods-crafting & wild-crafting, sailing, surfing and windsurfing.
    While practicing a vegetarian cooking and non-cooking (vegan) lifestyle, he has contributed to the formation of numerous well-known natural foods and sustainable enterprises in the US, Costa Rica, New Zealand and other countries abroad. Alfred was one of the original core partners who pioneered a world-famous vegan-vegetarian restaurant in Hollywood-Beverly Hills before organic food-store chains even existed.
    Both Alfred and his wife together, started the first successful NO-SMOKING! restaurant in the Gaienmae designer's district in Tokyo, Japan.



  3. #3
    For immediate release June 25, 2016
    on behalf of Pastor Henry Alfred Goolsbee and family


    Reporters at a Seventh Day Adventist college, unwittingly continue to promote false rumors and slanderous stories in online news at Pacific Union College in Angwin, California.

    As a direct result of the false arrest and wrongful imprisonment of Henry Alfred Goolsbee: various reporters continue to promote false and slanderous stories in online campus news.

    Despite PUC's presiding Elder, Pastor Mark Witas, having attempted to behave in a moral and ethically fit manner...

    SDA President Heather Knight, through her abject negligence as President of PUC, working in collusion with Lisa Paulson and JoAnn Bowen, all aided by a person pretending to be an ethical and responsible investigative reporter (Hannah Barnes) have lied to the PUC students and congregation, leaving the PUC, Pacific Conference and General Conference open to a massive libel lawsuit, regrading a false and slanderous (calumnious) article currently appearing in the PUC online news.
    Heather Knight, Ph.D. president@puc.edu
    Heather Knight (left) & Lisa Paulson and Hannah Barnes (below) continue to promote false rumors, gossip and slanderous reporting in PUC’s online news The CAMPUS CHRONICLE.

    Pastor Henry Alfred Goolsbee was in the process of submitting a formal online application to the Office of Admissions, as a mature student at PUC, having concluded meetings just minutes earlier, with Elder Mark Witas to that effect (on the same day, in fact, as to so-called “Campus Invasion).” Goolsbee had confirmed appointments with both, President Knight and Elder Witas well in advance of the day.
    Goolsbee had also, in days prior, concluded discussions with the Chair of the Dept. of Psychology ( and numerous others ) regarding the general climate of affairs at the college. The discussion had occurred while Goolsbee was working as a missionary delivering food and clothing to the many victims of the recent ravages of wildfires that had swept the area. It was there, at the Dept. of Psychology that Goolsbee learned of the ongoing disputes between many ethically minded professors and students who, were all dissatisfied with the socio-political climates being created there at PUC, (all of which were occurring there, due to numerous Discriminatory Human Rights Violations, ostensibly being perpetrated at PUC by their supervisors and colleagues).


    CLAIM OF "INVASION" LUDICROUS
    Pastor Goolsbee had been baptized there, at PUC, over 20 years ago and had been sponsored there as a self-financing missionary, by Elders Gerety and Wick. Pastor Goolsbee was returning to what he considered to be his spiritual home and family. Goolsbee's path of continuing education had already been confirmed by offers issuing from Andrew's University (a sister institution of Higher Education).
    Numerous emails between PUC directorates attest to the truth behind the false, misleading and absurd assumptions and assertions of Lia Paulson. Heather Knight and Lisa Paulson appear to be embroiled in numerous additional scandals and acts of misconduct at PUC - as reported in numerous other PUC online forums and news articles.
    Lisa Bissell Paulson lpaulson@puc.edu
    The article in question is nothing more than absolute nonsense and is a fabrication of the imagination of Lisa Paulson (right) and her cohorts. The article contains a set of lies and rumors that were initiated by Lisa Paulson due to her mismanagement and her own misunderstanding of events that transpired in the PUC cafeteria, where Goolsbee, having previously concluded meetings with Elder Mark Witas on the same day as to so-called “Campus Invasion,” was attempting to carryout an online process of matriculation at PUC. and further complicated by the inclusion of other lies and nonsense authored by yet another irresponsible and unprofessional reporter in New Zealand.

    As pictured in her own newspaper: Hannah Barnes shows that makeup is a personal choice and can be used as an art form, just like hair styles and fashion.
    These so-called managers and their "investigative reporter" don’t seem to understand the difference between facts and evidence vs gossip and rumors.
    Henry Alfred Goolsbee has offered the offending individuals named herein, who are in positions of managerial authority, numerous opportunities to resolve the matter and now challenges Hannah Barnes to prove to the world, and the members of the PUC congregation and PUC students that these absurd assertions have any foundation in truth or any merit whatsoever.
    Pastor Goolsbee also offers the individuals who, have behaved so foolishly, the opportunity to apologize both verbally and in writing and to print and distribute a retraction. While preparing to matriculate at Pacific Union College in Angwin, CA as series of other instances of injustice were underway there. Goolsbee visited the professors in charge of the psychology department where, he was forewarned of the ongoing scandals which, included the same individuals in upper management who seed the rumors and false report (reports based on the false rumors being circulated by irresponsible a similarly irresponsible journalist in New Zealand newspapers).

    • Your comment is awaiting moderation.
      June 7, 2016 at 1:58 pm
      Heather Knight, Lisa Paulson promote false and slanderous reporting in PUC’s online news CAMPUS CHRONICLE; Despite Pastor Mark Witas having attempted to behave in a moral and ethically fit manner.
      For immediate release June 7, 2016
      by Pastor Henry Alfred Goolsbee
      Despite Pastor Mark Witas having attempted to behave in a moral and ethically fit manner; President Heather Knight, Lisa Paulson and Hannah Barnes continue to promote false and slanderous reporting in PUC’s online news The Campus Chronicle.
      Pastor Henry Alfred Goolsbee was attempting to carryout an online process of matriculation as a mature at PUC, having previously concluded meetings with Elder Marc Witas on the same day as to so-called “Campus Invasion.” Pastor Goolsbee had been baptized at PUC over 20 years ago and was returning to his spiritual home and family.
      Numerous emails between PUC directorates attest to the truth behind the false, misleading and absurd assumptions and assertions of Lia Paulson. Heather Knight and Lisa Paulson appear to be embroiled in numerous additional scandals and acts of misconduct and various scandals at PUC as reported in numerous other PUC online forums and news articles.
      Heather Knight, through her abject negligence as President of PUC, working in collusion with Lisa Paulson and JoAnn Bowen, and aided by a person pretending to be an ethical and responsible investigative reporter (Hannah Barnes) have left the PUC, Pacific Conference and General Conference open to a massive lawsuit regrading a false and slanderous (calumnious) article currently appearing in the PUC online news.
      The article in question is nothing more than absolute nonsense and is a fabrication of the imagination of Lisa Paulson and her cohorts. The article contains a set of lies and rumors that were initiated by Lisa Paulson due to her mismanagement and her own misunderstanding of events that transpired in the PUC cafeteria, where Pastor Henry Alfred Goolsbee was attempting to carryout an online process of matriculation at PUC, having previously concluded meetings with Elder Marc Witas on the same day as to so-called “Campus Invasion”; and further com;scatted by the inclusion of other lies and nonsense authored by yet another irresponsible and unprofessional reporter in New Zealand.
      These so-called reporters don’t seem to understand the difference between facts and evidence vs a collection of gossip and rumors.
      Henry Alfred Goolsbee has offered the above named individuals involved, who are in positions of managerial authority, numerous opportunities to resolve the matter and now challenges Hannah Barnes to prove to the world and the members of the PUC congregation and PUC students that her assertions have any merit whatsoever or any foundation in truth.
      Pastor Goolsbee also offers the individuals who, have behaved so foolishly, the opportunity to apologize both verbally and in writing and to print and distribute a retraction.
      Reply






  4. #4

    Criminal offense to obstruct, prevent, pervert, or defeat the course of justice

    Henry Alfred Goolsbee reminds government officials in New Zealand that: "Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who conspires to obstruct, prevent, pervert, or defeat the course of justice in New Zealand or the course of justice in an overseas jurisdiction." ~ Crimes Act New Zealand - Section 116: amended, on 18 June 2002, by section 6(1) of the Crimes Amendment Act 2002 (2002 No 20).

    The Office of Numerous New Zealand Ministers (including but not limited to those pictured herein) were notified of the numerous ongoing miscarriages of justice including Henry Alfred Goolsbee's wrongful arrest and wrongful imprisonment.
    The ministers all chose to ignore Goolsbee's (and other's) plight.



    Further investigations indicates that many people in New Zealand share Goolsbee's opinion and believe that these and other cohorts are involved in countless corrupt and inappropriate activities that are Unbecoming of a Government and Ministerial Officer.

    These Ministers should all be investigated (in exquisite detail) for numerous instances of inappropriate behavior, involving many individuals who have likewise wrongfully been accused and convicted.
    The usual procedure is to pass-off issues that require urgent attention to other officials and ministers, like a game of musical chairs...

    The usual procedure is to pass-off issues that require urgent attention to other officials and ministers, like a game of musical chairs, in an effort to wear down the resolve of individuals making legitimate complaints. They waste the time, energy and financial resources of the victims in hopes that they will become exhausted and give-up on the complaints procedure.
    When complainants follow through the most common trick is to find some rule to dismiss the complaint.


    When complainants follow through, up to the highest levels (in an effort to escape the hamster-wheels of government-created marry-go-rounds), the most common trick of government officials, is to find some rule to dismiss the complaints, regardless of how critical or severe the matters might be.
    Then the judiciary takes over and proceeds to further exhaust and frustrate the victim, protecting the unsavory government officials with endless rounds of bogus court proceedings.


    If a complainant perseveres, the judiciary takes over and proceeds to further exhaust and frustrate the victim, protecting the unsavory government officials with endless rounds of bogus court proceedings. As many now believe, these mock trials and other court proceedings as intended to create and foster the facade that New Zealand's government is not engaged in corrupt and despicable behavior. However, there are tens of thousands of citizens from around the world including tens of thousands New Zealanders who heartily agree with this point of view. Goolsbee has accumulated sufficient evidence to confidently assert that the collusion between various New Zealand government officials is tantamount to "Crimes Against Humanity," and criminal activity under the Crimes Act of New Zealand including but not limited to Section 116.
    116 Conspiring to defeat justice

    Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who conspires to obstruct, prevent, pervert, or defeat the course of justice in New Zealand or the course of justice in an overseas jurisdiction.



    Compare: 1908 No 32 s 137
    Section 116: amended, on 18 June 2002, by section 6(1) of the Crimes Amendment Act 2002 (2002 No 20).
    Never let it be said that biased and irresponsible reporters didn't contribute to the false and misleading statements which continue to cause harm to Goolsbee and his children and extended family members.


    Is Sally Kidson, Nelson Mail reporter an irresponsible and negligent journalist? Many might share Goolsbee's opinion that she is a puppet of the corruption that plagues New Zealand government.
    Is Sally Kidson, Nelson Mail reporter an irresponsible and negligent journalist?
    Many might share Goolsbee's opinion that she is a mere puppet of the corruption that plagues New Zealand government.
    Ethical journalism should be accurate and fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information.
    Journalists should:
    Never deliberately distort facts or context, including visual information.
    Provide context. Take special care not to misrepresent or oversimplify in promoting, previewing or summarizing a story.
    Gather, update and correct information throughout the life of a news story.
    Consider sources’ motives before promising anonymity. Reserve anonymity for sources who may face danger, retribution or other harm, and have information that cannot be obtained elsewhere. Explain why anonymity was granted.
    Diligently seek subjects of news coverage to allow them to respond to criticism or allegations of wrongdoing.
    Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable. Give voice to the voiceless.
    Support the open and civil exchange of views, even views they find repugnant.
    Recognize a special obligation to serve as watchdogs over public affairs and government. Seek to ensure that the public’s business is conducted in the open, and that public records are open to all.
    Boldly tell the story of the diversity and magnitude of the human experience. Seek sources whose voices we seldom hear.

    Minimize Harm

    Ethical journalism treats sources, subjects, colleagues and members of the public as human beings deserving of respect.
    Journalists should:
    Consider the long-term implications of the extended reach and permanence of publication. Provide updated and more complete information as appropriate.
    Balance the public’s need for information against potential harm or discomfort. Pursuit of the news is not a license for arrogance or undue intrusiveness.
    Show compassion for those who may be affected by news coverage. Use heightened sensitivity when dealing with juveniles, victims of sex crimes, and sources or subjects who are inexperienced or unable to give consent. Consider cultural differences in approach and treatment.
    Recognize that legal access to information differs from an ethical justification to publish or broadcast.
    Realize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than public figures and others who seek power, influence or attention. Weigh the consequences of publishing or broadcasting personal information.
    Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity, even if others do.
    Balance a suspect’s right to a fair trial with the public’s right to know. Consider the implications of identifying criminal suspects before they face legal charges.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •