In
this post John "Brockovich" wrote:
I wonder where these numbers come from?
Also, it seems to me that the above suggests that 5% of judgments are made maliciously. Even if the remaining 95% are made in "good faith", it doesn't mean that they adhere to the rule of law. As we can see from
Taito, the good intentions of the judges of the top NZ court resulted in a "fundamentally flawed and unlawful system" which "operated arbitrarily", "contrary to fundamental conceptions of fairness and justice". There is nothing to suggest that the system has changed to the better, unless I am missing something.
Bookmarks