View RSS Feed

Justice111

Cover up going on in the court to protect corrupt barrister and police officer

Rate this Entry
Today a flier was distributed in letterboxes around parts of Auckland. A copy of the flier has also been sent today to a large number of MP and media email addresses.

A copy of the flier is copied below:



AN ILLEGAL COVER UP IS OCCURRING IN OUR COURT RIGHT NOW TO PROTECT A NEGLIGENT AND CORRUPT BARRISTER AND A CORRUPT HIGH RANKING POLICE OFFICER.

LET’S REMIND OUR NEW ZEALAND JUDGES THAT THE BIGGEST AND MOST POWERFUL LEGAL VOICE IN NEW ZEALAND IS THE VOICE OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC. WE NEED YOUR HELP PLEASE.


We have been involved in a court case that concerns a very corrupt high ranking Police Officer and very corrupt barrister, Christopher Lynch (of the law firm Inder Lynch, Papakura) for nearly 7 years. Christopher Lynch is the son of the former president of the Auckland Law Society.

Despite neither one of us (Amanda and Anne) having any formal legal training, one of us, Amanda, is no stranger to Court process or Court proceedings.

To give you a background of Amanda’s legal experience, she, for many years, represented clients in matters to do with the Residential Tenancies Act and was very successful in that representation. Amanda has also overturned two New Zealand Law Society decisions. She has also represented herself against barrister Barry Hart (now disbarred we believe) who acted for another barrister against Amanda, Amanda won the case.

Amanda has also been successful (in February of this year) in having the District Court void (set aside) a Disputes Tribunal decision which is SELDOM done by the District Court.

Amanda was also accepted by the University of Auckland in 2013 to study Law and Criminology but had to stop her studies to represent our family trust against corrupt barrister Christopher Maurice Lynch of Inder Lynch Papakura, and the corrupt police officer who is Amanda’s ex-partner and a former client of barrister Lynch’s.

The Court presently holds our overwhelming and unchallengeable evidence that this police officer and corrupt barrister Lynch have, to win judgments against us, done, but not limited to, the following:

• Deliberately hidden a large amount of files for over two years that contained documents we needed to defend ourselves against them;
• Deliberately hidden a substantial amount of financial documents (bank statements) so they were, and have been able to, get away with their blatant lies about what financially occurred between the corrupt police officer and our family trust during a 6 and half year period;
• Deliberately held onto an original loan document but lied to the Court that we had been given that original loan document, only to have Mr Lynch found in possession of that original loan document after he had successfully hidden it for three years;
• Committed a substantial amount of perjury in a 8 day high court trial.

The list goes on and on

To cover up the fraud done against us by barrister Lynch (officer of the high court) and the high ranking police officer, the Court has sided with corrupt barrister Lynch who applied, and had us adjudicated bankrupt (on the 15 December 2015 for $3,500) after corrupt barrister Lynch and the corrupt police officer have defrauded us out of our entire life savings (hundreds of thousands of dollars).

We have filed an appeal in the Court of Appeal to challenge the bankruptcy. The Court has informed us that we have to pay $6,600 before they will let us proceed with our appeal against the bankruptcy.

The Court of Appeal knows we do not have the money. The Court of Appeal also knows that the sum ($3,500) used by corrupt barrister Lynch to adjudicated us bankrupt, came from the Court Appeal granting legal costs to Lynch and the corrupt police officer, after they had, via their barrister Peter Wright (of Shortland Chambers Auckland) lied their way through a 2014 Court of Appeal hearing. Our current position of being adjudicated bankrupt works extremely well for corrupt barrister Lynch and the corrupt police officer as the bankruptcy shuts down our ability to file any more legal proceedings against them (apart from our current appeal in the Court of Appeal to do with our bankruptcy) as people who are bankrupt are not allowed to start any new legal proceedings.

We want the public to know what is going on behind the legal curtain, and for the general public to send a clear message to our judges that we, the general public, will not, or ever, tolerate corruption in our New Zealand Courts.

Unless we can find the $6,600 before the 14 April 2016 to pay to the Court of Appeal, corrupt barrister Lynch and the corrupt police officer will get away with their deliberate fraud, and the Court would have got away with covering up the fraud done to us by an officer of the high court (barrister Lynch) and a high ranking police officer who is supposed to uphold the law, not steal from innocent members of the public by using foul illegal tactics in our Court.

If you can help us, with even $5.00 towards the $6,600 we have to pay the Court of Appeal, we would be so grateful.

If you wish to contact us to view the overwhelming and unchallengeable evidence we have against corrupt barrister Lynch and the corrupt police officer (which evidence the Court has, and continues to date to turn a blind eye to) please make contact with Amanda on (09) 296-5314 or (0274) 876894 or srentals@xtra.co or Anne on (09) 948-4727 or (027) 2375057 or valdishouse@gmail.com

Just as a final important note:

Amanda has another Court case currently in the High Court. It involves two members of the public being assisted by two Ministry of Justice staff to breach a Court order, maintain illegal possession of a very valuable horse, and later obtain illegal ownership of the horse which is worth over $100,000.

The case was to come back before the High Court on the 02 May 2016. Amanda’s case is very strong. Given the Court has adjudicated us bankrupt, the case is at serious risk of being discontinued by the Court if we cannot find the $6,600 we have to pay the Court of Appeal to challenge the bankruptcy.

Our bankruptcy is presently working extremely well for the Crown as the court case that involves two ministry of justice staff aiding in theft is just about to be permanently shut down by the Court.

Again, if you wish to contact us to view the overwhelming and unchallengeable evidence we have against the two Ministry of Justice staff, please contact Amanda on (09) 296-5314 or (0274) 876894 or srentals@xtra.co or Anne on (09) 948-4727 or (027) 2375057 or valdishouse@gmail.com

Submit "Cover up going on in the court to protect corrupt barrister and police officer" to Digg Submit "Cover up going on in the court to protect corrupt barrister and police officer" to del.icio.us Submit "Cover up going on in the court to protect corrupt barrister and police officer" to StumbleUpon Submit "Cover up going on in the court to protect corrupt barrister and police officer" to Google

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags
Categories
Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Q. C.'s Avatar
    If you believe there is admissible and reliable evidence to prove guilt in front of a jury, then file a private criminal prosecutions against those you accuse.

    It is the best possible way to get around the problem. It is a simple process, you just follow the section of the Crimes Act you charge them on and follow the Criminal Procedures Act 2011.

    If the Police can run successful prosecutions anyone can. You just have to ensure the facts are in fact admissible and reliable and support the charges - which requires a rational and impartial mind.

    If you cannot apply a rational and impartial mind to the facts don't bother.
  2. Justice111's Avatar
    Believe me, I am way past emotion and very sound on evidential material. Thank you so much for commenting on my post, I really appreciate your advice.