Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Top judges speak out in defence of system

Collapse
X
Collapse
  •  

  • Judges defend justice system

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Helen Winkleman.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	6.2 KB
ID:	24828
    In the wake of public criticism over recent poor court judgments, two of the country's top judges have fronted for their judicial colleagues to inform the public just how accountable they are. In a rare interview, with the New Zealand Herald , High Court chief judge Helen Winkelmann and District Court chief judge Jan-Marie Doogue told the newspaper about the effects personal comments had on judges.

    The article provided many quotes designed to instil public confidence and keep any need for the judicial watchman at bay. Justice Winkelmann said : "The requirements that judges work in public and that they provide reasons for their decisions provides the best means of accountability. Their decisions can be, and are, the subject of public comment and criticism." She also said in the above linked article that "The courts are open to the public and the media and are regularly subject to criticism."In that sense, I don't see how they could become more open. Criticism of judicial performance must be expected as part of how our open society works."

    Winkelmann's comments defending the role played by the judiciary follow recent decisions issued by her which contain no reasons and have been suppressed from the public. A current example concerns Kiwisfirst publisher Vince Siemer, who is before the Supreme Court on 15 November 2012, facing six weeks prison for contempt for reporting Winkelmann denied trial by jury to 18 Urewera accused in December 2010. This perverse ruling prohibiting publication of a decision of New Zealand Court was "rubber stamped" on the cover page with an order it be suppressed from the public.

    Not only was no reason ever given for the suppression, more than a year later the Court of Appeal concealed Winkelmann's reasons for denying trial by jury (potential jurors would "likely use improper reasoning processes") in upholding the conviction.

    It was ten years ago the Privy Council ruled in Taito v Q that New Zealand Court of Appeal judges were involved in systemic breaches of due process in denying criminal appeals. The only certain change this last decade is New Zealand no longer have the Privy Council to appeal to. Notably last year in Chapman v Atty General, the NZ Supreme Court exempted judges from enforced compliance to the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 by a 3 to 2 vote.

    The myth judges are above corruption has resulted in a refusal to put common sense mechanisms in place at the very time the Supreme Court has claimed laws which hold judges accountable threaten their independence and therefore are unenforceable. One proposed solution for reform is based upon recognised international principles, "For genuine judicial accountability, three things are urgently required in New Zealand; an enforceable code of conduct, a register of judges' pecuniary interests and a requirement that court proceedings be recorded and parties have access to the transcript."

    Ideas like these create shivers in the cloistered back hallways of New Zealand's courts. While Justices Winkelmann and Doogue know what has been revealed here to be just the tip of the iceberg, they continue to insist publicly that the best scenario is to leave the judges to police themselves.

    • courtwatcher
      #1
      courtwatcher commented
      Editing a comment
      In the New Zealand judiciary, judges are promoted from the back of the sheep herd. Winkelmann is Chief Judge of the High Court of New Zealand simply because she is weak and malleable. No judge in New Zealand wants the position headed by a leader for fear the appointee might start cleaning up this hotbed of corruption.

    • flimflam
      #2
      flimflam commented
      Editing a comment
      In 2004 the family court in Wellington tried a transcript system. I had a hearing where this system was used, with a transcript available at the end of each day. Since that time I have been back in the family court with new applications regarding the same children. I have quoted the transcript and referred to it. This has enabled us to avoid going through the same pitiful mistakes which have adversely affected my children yet again. It has resulted in the same old claptrap rolled out by the other side, at tax payer expense being stymied before it has started. Reducing time, cost and providing accountability for parents and so called professionals. No wonder the transcript pilot system was not implemented but canned instead.
    Posting comments is disabled.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • Judge Goddard Shipped to United Kingdom for Inquiry
    by courtwatcher
    Official comments from the United Kingdom lauding the appointment of New Zealand High Court Justice Lowell Goddard to head an Inquiry into broad child sexual abuse have legal doyens in New Zealand privately scratching their heads. Goddard J scored dead last in the 2014 poll of New Zealand judges last year, with many lawyers extremely critical of Lowell’s opportunistic public stances, liberties with the truth and contrarian judgments. But let us not be burdened by the empirical truth when we sho...
    05-02-2015, 12:27 PM
  • TRANSPARENCY IN NEW ZEALAND
    by admin

    Transparency International New Zealand posted a news story on Voxy yesterday stating its "emergent overall findings" into its "National Integrity Systems review" "found that high standards of independence, integrity and accountability were generally met, although areas for improvements were noted. New Zealand also scores highly for fiscal transparency." The story states a further report will be provided in July, with the full report concluding August 27th. The public are invited...
    14-05-2013, 02:50 PM
  • Judges push Parliament to protect them
    by admin
    New Zealand Judges have ganged up to push Parliament into considering legislation which gives them greater privacy, stating criticism of judges - what they called "unwarranted and improper attack" - is increasing on internet sites; adding complaints to the Judicial Conduct Commissioner, while "appropriate in principle", are frequently being used "essentially to harass judges". Eight judges, including the Chief Justice and Acting Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, expressly endorsed the submissions t...
    25-04-2013, 11:14 AM
  • Shake up for judges mooted
    by admin
    Judges are facing the biggest overhaul of accountability in decades, with the Cabinet considering legal changes that would compel the judiciary to publish annual reports, bring transparency to judicial appointments and attempt to stem criticism washing up against the bench. The changes being considered by ministers today will see the 115-year-old Judicature Act updated to modernise a branch of state that has come under fire from some.

    A Herald-DigiPoll survey has found 53 per cent...
    15-04-2013, 10:07 AM
  • Attack by Family Court judges force Government backdown
    by admin
    The Government has backed down from radical Family Court changes which would have banned lawyers from acting in the early stages of disputes over the care of children. The proposed changes, designed to save $15 million a year, have been slammed as "unsafe" in an outspoken submission by Family Court judges. Principal Family Court Judge Laurence Ryan, on behalf of the full Family Court Bench, said a proposal to ban lawyers until the final stages of parental disputes would drive parents into more...
    07-04-2013, 10:10 AM
  • Litigants without lawyers biggest problem facing the Family Court
    by admin

    Current proposals with the select committee considering the Family Court Proceedings Reform Bill include a compulsory $900 family dispute service, axing counselling sessions and restricting access to legal representation for parents and children. Judge Laurence Ryan is the new principal Family court Judge and he is concerned about changes to legal aid - meaning dozens more litigants without lawyers .
    Ryan was appointed to the bench in 1996 - he has a strong interest in case ...
    25-03-2013, 08:07 PM
Working...
X