PDA

View Full Version : Court of Appeal Fabricates Fictitious Appeals



FairHearing
23-10-2016, 02:02 PM
Mr Koyama is no longer alone (https://www.fairhearing.info/criminal/) in alleging forgery in New Zealand courts:


The Court of Appeal of New Zealand, which was nailed by the Privy Council in Taito v R as a “fundamentally flawed and unlawful system” operating arbitrarily and “certainly… contrary to fundamental conceptions of fairness and justice”, has descended to the next, criminal, level.

On 12 September 2016, Helen Winkelmann (https://www.fairhearing.info/judges/helen-winkelmann/), Simon France and Mark Woolford delivered judgments [2016] NZCA 429 and [2016] NZCA 430, in which they fabricated, attributed to the appellant, and dismissed three (!) entirely fictitious appeals – that’s right, the appeals that the appellant has not brought or pursued.

Simon France, a judge of the High Court, was assigned to the Court of Appeal panel by his wife, Ellen France (https://www.fairhearing.info/judges/ellen-france/), who at the time was the President of the Court of Appeal. In the same judgments, Simon France allowed the respondent’s cross-appeal the leave to bring which was previously granted by his wife. Mr France also relied on another judgment made by his wife in the litigation between the parties.

Relevantly, Ellen France was subject to allegations of fraud in relation to the leave to cross-appeal she granted to the respondent. The allegations were made by the appellant in a recall application which Ms France personally ordered to remove from the court record and to dispose of. Ms France threatened the self-represented appellant with a “firmer response” if he continued to pursue allegations of misconduct on her part.

When the appellant complained to the court and demanded the Registrar, Clare O’Brien, to provide copies of documents proving the existence of the fictitious appeals, Ms O’Brien refused to do so but admitted that she arbitrarily and covertly (without the parties’ knowledge) withheld the appellant’s written submissions from a judicial panel. Ms O’Brien further admitted that she actively impeded the appellant’s attempts to inform the current President of the Court of Appeal Stephen Kós of the matter. Presumably, it was not the first time the Registrar obstructed, prevented, perverted, or defeated the course of justice in New Zealand.

FairHearing
06-12-2016, 05:23 PM
732

The uncontroverted affidavit stating the facts illustrated above can be found here (https://www.fairhearing.info/criminal/).

Q. C.
06-12-2016, 05:48 PM
732

The uncontroverted affidavit stating the facts illustrated above can be found here (https://www.fairhearing.info/criminal/).

FairHearing: Putting aside YODA's claims (which I do not accept) you maybe missing the point. We have in NZ systemic Judicial and Crown Executive corruption (when those who are involved think it is necessary to be corrupt).

How that manifests itself is almost irrelevant, if it were not fabrication, bias etc by those Judges and that Registrar (as in your case) it would be something else by them or others in the system to defeat the 'rule of law' and justice.

Why else would it be described as, and be, 'systemic'?

FairHearing
06-12-2016, 07:11 PM
I'm not sure which point, specifically, I missed.

It's pointless to talk about "systemic corruption" without referring to particular cases.

Q. C.
06-12-2016, 07:27 PM
I'm not sure which point, specifically, I missed.

It's pointless to talk about "systemic corruption" without referring to particular cases.

I agree. However, who do you present your particular cases to, when there is systemic Judicial and Crown Executive corruption?

You and I cannot prove our particular cases unless there is someone in authority to rule on what has happened, which there cannot be in a systemically corrupt system.

Nor will the mainstream media investigate the allegations and report on what they find.

So.....!

FairHearing
06-12-2016, 07:34 PM
...So all that's available to us is to post here, for everyone's perusal and in the interests of the public, thanks to the owners of this forum. That's what I did.

Q. C.
06-12-2016, 07:45 PM
...So all that's available to us is to post here, for everyone's perusal and in the interests of the public, thanks to the owners of this forum. That's what I did.

And that is what those who are part of the systemic corruption what you and I to do and expect us to do. And hope we, or others, do not do the only thing which will stop and expose their systemic corruption.