Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Justice Dept Denies Negligence

Collapse
X
Collapse
  •  

  • Justice Dept Denies Negligence



    General Manager for Higher Courts Paula Tesoriero, today denied that former Appeal Court registrar Claire Brown had been negligent by sealing Court orders altered by Wellington lawyer Roger Chapman. The Ministry of Justice is ultimately responsible for the
    administrative functions of the Courts, this includes sealing orders solicitors make which are supposed to follow the orders made by the Court.

    Ms Tesoriero had been asked to consider evidence Wellington law firm Johnston Lawrence and Mr Chapman prepared orders for sealing that changed a decision of the Court of Appeal, effectively rending it nugatory. Ms Tesoriero denied that Mr Chapman's orders constituted a fraud , nor was the registrar considered negligent by sealing orders materially different from the decision in question.

    Minister for Justice Amy Adams has been asked to reconsider Ms Tesoriero's decsion and determine whether or not the orders were materially different and if so, was the Ministry negligent in not ensuring orders sealed in the registry followed the actual decision of the Court.

    The decision itself awarded costs to an estate, but a week after the hearing, Mr Chapman's had orders sealed making it appear that the costs were due to one of the parties personally.The falsified orders were then used to issue a bankruptcy notice, allowing Johnston Lawrence to take control of the income from a million dollar estate .

    Brandons of Wellington were subsequently responsible for the estates affairs, which included conducting the bankruptcy action initiated by Mr Chapman's firm and defending several applications seeking disclosure of the estates financial affairs.

    Last week, the former President of the Court of Appeal Sir Mark O'Regan also turned a blind eye after declining to consider whether or not there had been a fraud upon the Court in a case before him, seeking leave to appeal the bankruptcy. Justice O'Regan later dismissed a motion seeking to have him recused on the grounds he had not declared a potential conflict over his brother John O'Regan being the principal of Brandons, who represented the respondents in the case under consideration.

    The Judicial Conduct Commissioner is now considering a complaint that Justice O'Regan was guilty of misconduct by failing to declare the connection to his brother's law firm, and then misstated the facts of the case to fit within the framework of his legislative authority to dismiss it.

    Attached Files

    • Q. C.
      #1
      Q. C. commented
      Editing a comment
      ADMIN: You say "Justice O'Regan was guilty of misconduct by ... then misstated the facts of the case to fit within the framework of his legislative authority to dismiss it."

      As I have already posted this is nothing new for O'Regan as: O'Regan in the COA in 2012 ruled that Heath J's formal legal statement of 2011 (made in Heath's Court of what he considered at a trial in 2006) was dealt with by the COA and Supreme Court in 2009.

      This 2012 miraculous ruling, that in 2009 these illustrious appeal courts could have ruled on something Heath J had yet to declare in his Court until 2011, is only possible by O'Regan and his cohorts recording in their 2012 judgment a different Point on Appeal (which was dealt with in 2009 and not challenged in any form whatsoever) and then ruling on that never filed Point on Appeal.

      "misstated the facts" in this case being done purely to result in a procedural "framework" decision that cover-up criminal conduct by Crown Law Counsels.
      Last edited by Q. C.; 05-08-2015, 10:41 AM.

    • Q. C.
      #2
      Q. C. commented
      Editing a comment
      Originally posted by Yoda
      CRIME OF FORGERY IN THE COURT OF APPEAL, DONE BY NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS!.................................................. .................................................. ............
      ADMIN: Again I suggest you remove the rest of YODA's comment, as his incorrect interpretation of the facts and what he mostly says in his case denigrates your argument and facts.

      If anyone who has read YODA's posts, studied the facts and who understands the basics of legal processes disagrees with me in a material way please say so and why.

    • admin
      #3
      admin commented
      Editing a comment
      Threads

      Originally posted by Yoda
      Please make sure Q.C. off from my threads.
      The forum threads are meant for promoting discussion, and as such belong to no one and QC or anyone else is welcome(or should be ) to comment.If you want to document your progress with a particular matter, you could use the blog function and disable the comments if you're not interested in debate. Thanks.
    Posting comments is disabled.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • Judge Goddard refuses to answer MPs' questions
    by admin
    The former New Zealand judge who headed a UK inquiry into child sexual abuse has said she will not appear before British MPs to answer questions about her time in charge. Dame Lowell Goddard said for her to be summoned would compromise the inquiry's "independence and integrity". She also hit out at "malicious, defamatory attacks" by the British media and said she was disappointed the government had not defended her. British MPs have asked the former head of the child sex abuse inquiry to expl...
    11-11-2016, 11:47 AM
  • Judge Lowell Goddard's epic fail
    by admin
    Dame Lowell Goddard, the New Zealand judge who resigned last week as chair of the 100 million (N$183.5m) Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA), did not leave her post voluntarily but was effectively fired. Dame Lowell, appointed by then-Home Secretary Theresa May just over a year ago, had already lost the confidence of senior staff and members of the inquiry panel, according to two well-placed legal sources. The Home Office has denied she was sacked, according to reports. After she ...
    09-08-2016, 10:07 AM
  • Sir Ngatata Love's lawyer claims agreement had no impact on Trust
    by admin
    Sir Ngatata Love's lawyer Colin Carruthers QC says the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) theory against his client is wrong, with a key agreement placing no financial cost on the Wellington Tenths Trust. The former leading Treaty of Waitangi negotiator and academic is on trial in the High Court at Wellington, accused of obtaining funds by deception, or alternatively of obtaining a secret commission.The charges relate to allegations that Love showed favour to Auckland property developer Redwood, and ...
    05-08-2016, 01:44 PM
  • Transport boss pleads guilty to corruption charges
    by admin
    The Serious Fraud Office says the guilty plea yesterday by an Auckland Council manager to corruption charges shows the dangers in not questioning a culture of gratuities. Barrie Kenneth James George, 69, this morning at the High Court at Auckland pleaded guilty to two charges of accepting bribes as a public official when he took gifts worth $103,580 between 2005 and 2012. The gifts included cash, and lavish overseas holidays for George and his family. SFO Director, Julie Read welcomed the guilty plea...
    04-08-2016, 09:40 AM
  • Identities of corrupt JP's stay secret
    by admin
    The identities of Justices of the Peace disciplined for incompetence, making false allegations or misusing their title for personal gain are being kept secret by the Ministry of Justice.In the case of the above JP Denis Selwyn Callesen of Keri Keri, the Crown Law Office even halted a private prosecution against Mr Callessen after evidence emerged that Mr Callessen and his former secretary Robin Morris had perverted the course of justice.

    The Ministry believes the privacy of...
    23-07-2016, 11:35 AM
  • Government funded escape artist Philip Smith found guilty
    by admin
    The murderer who embarrassed New Zealand law and border authorities by flying to Brazil while on temporary release from prison has been convicted for the audacious escape. Charges of escaping lawful custody and making a false statement to renew a passport have been added to Phillip John Smith's lengthy criminal record, along with murder, child sex abuse, kidnapping, tax fraud and arson. In an unusual legal procedure, a jury was chosen at the Auckland District Court today and the judge immedia...
    22-07-2016, 01:05 PM
Working...
X