Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Appeal Court President caught out

Collapse
X
Collapse
  •  

  • Former Appeal Court President caught out


    Former President of the New Zealand Court of Appeal and Supreme Court Justice Sir Mark O'Regan was caught with his pants down yesterday, after an application to disqualify him from ruling on a matter involving a fraud on the Court of Appeal was filed in the Supreme Court.

    Earlier this week, Sir Mark dismissed an application seeking to overturn a bankruptcy resulting from fraudulent court orders. Sealed orders of the Court of Appeal were altered by Wellington lawyer Roger Chapman making it appear that costs awarded to an estate were in fact due to his client personally.


    The case has been described by several Wellington practitioners as a national disgrace and a blatant fraud. A fraud upon the court is committed by court officials or officers of the court such as lawyers and is directed at the “judicial machinery”. It involves wilful conduct which injects false information into the judicial process by undermining the integrity of a proceeding.

    Essentially, fraud upon the court requires a showing that a party has set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability to impartially adjudicate a matter because of improper conduct and misrepresentation by an officer of the Court.

    The application filed today also alleged that Sir Mark had a serious undeclared conflict of interest by sitting on the fraud case after it was disclosed that the lawyers on record for the opposing party were Brandons Solicitors. Brandons followed Johnston Lawrence and Roger Chapman as solicitors for the respondents, but the registry confirmed there was nothing on the Court file indicating Justice O’Regan had declared a potential conflict of interest due to his personal connection to the law firm representing one of the parties.


    To support the application that Justice O’Regan recuse himself, the Court was notified that his brother John O’Regan is the principal at Brandons law firm, who along with Roger Chapman and Johnston Lawrence have allegedly managed to conceal this fraud for over a decade.

    The Court of Appeal confirmed that Sir Mark has already made a number of decisions in favour of the respondents without declaring his connection to Brandons, who have now been named as proposed parties to the proceedings as the result of filing several affidavits based on the disputed orders.
    Attached Files

    • courtwatcher
      #1
      courtwatcher commented
      Editing a comment
      What I find amazing about this story is that it represents only the tip of the iceberg with Mark O'Regan. This judge has been selling favours from the bench for years. O'Regan is not regarded as possessing a notable intellect. The conventional wisdom is O'Regan's promotions to Court of Appeal President and now Supreme Court judge are largely the result of his suspect personal character and indulgences which ensure he can be counted on to not inject integrity to the New Zealand court system likely to make his judicial peers uncomfortable. It is an extremely perverse system which gets no mainstream press coverage due to the threat of legal persecution.

    • Q. C.
      #2
      Q. C. commented
      Editing a comment
      Originally posted by courtwatcher
      What I find amazing about this story is that it represents only the tip of the iceberg with Mark O'Regan. This judge has been selling favours from the bench for years...
      I agree: O'Regan (with Justices Harrison and White) in the COA in 2012 ruled that Heath J's formal legal statement of 2011 (made in Heath's Court of what he considered at a trial in 2006) was dealt with by the COA and Supreme Court in 2009.

      This 2012 miraculous ruling, that in 2009 these illustrious appeal courts could have ruled on something Heath J had yet to declare in his Court until 2011, is only possible by O'Regan and his cohorts recording in their 2012 judgment a different Point on Appeal (which was dealt with in 2009 and not challenged in any form whatsoever) and ruling on that never filed Point on Appeal.

      I understand this being done purely to cover-up criminal conduct by Crown Law Counsels.

      O'Regan's decision is appealed to the Supreme Court by Notice of Leave to Appeal filed in October 2012 - I understand the Supreme Court has, as yet, done nothing with that leave application even though it is 2 years 9 months old.
      Last edited by Q. C.; 28-07-2015, 10:37 AM.

    • John "Brockovich"
      #3
      John "Brockovich" commented
      Editing a comment
      Originally posted by Q. C.
      ...O'Regan's decision is appealed to the Supreme Court by Notice of Leave to Appeal filed in October 2012 - I understand the Supreme Court has, as yet, done nothing with that leave application even though it is 2 years 9 months old.
      Yes and I know why they are waiting: O'Regan J (who is now a Supreme Court Judge) has told his fellow Judges that if they rule that he, Harrison and White were corrupt on this matter he will expose their corruption as well. Saying we are all on the same side with the Commissioner, Law Society and A-G, just like the Wilson J situation with his $M payout. Lets bury it - but how!

      We of course wait.
    Posting comments is disabled.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • Judge Goddard refuses to answer MPs' questions
    by admin
    The former New Zealand judge who headed a UK inquiry into child sexual abuse has said she will not appear before British MPs to answer questions about her time in charge. Dame Lowell Goddard said for her to be summoned would compromise the inquiry's "independence and integrity". She also hit out at "malicious, defamatory attacks" by the British media and said she was disappointed the government had not defended her. British MPs have asked the former head of the child sex abuse inquiry to expl...
    11-11-2016, 12:47 PM
  • Judge Lowell Goddard's epic fail
    by admin
    Dame Lowell Goddard, the New Zealand judge who resigned last week as chair of the £100 million (N$183.5m) Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA), did not leave her post voluntarily but was effectively fired. Dame Lowell, appointed by then-Home Secretary Theresa May just over a year ago, had already lost the confidence of senior staff and members of the inquiry panel, according to two well-placed legal sources. The Home Office has denied she was sacked, according to reports. After she ...
    09-08-2016, 11:07 AM
  • Sir Ngatata Love's lawyer claims agreement had no impact on Trust
    by admin
    Sir Ngatata Love's lawyer Colin Carruthers QC says the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) theory against his client is wrong, with a key agreement placing no financial cost on the Wellington Tenths Trust. The former leading Treaty of Waitangi negotiator and academic is on trial in the High Court at Wellington, accused of obtaining funds by deception, or alternatively of obtaining a secret commission.The charges relate to allegations that Love showed favour to Auckland property developer Redwood, and ...
    05-08-2016, 02:44 PM
  • Transport boss pleads guilty to corruption charges
    by admin
    The Serious Fraud Office says the guilty plea yesterday by an Auckland Council manager to corruption charges shows the dangers in not questioning a culture of gratuities. Barrie Kenneth James George, 69, this morning at the High Court at Auckland pleaded guilty to two charges of accepting bribes as a public official when he took gifts worth $103,580 between 2005 and 2012. The gifts included cash, and lavish overseas holidays for George and his family. SFO Director, Julie Read welcomed the guilty plea...
    04-08-2016, 10:40 AM
  • Identities of corrupt JP's stay secret
    by admin
    The identities of Justices of the Peace disciplined for incompetence, making false allegations or misusing their title for personal gain are being kept secret by the Ministry of Justice.In the case of the above JP Denis Selwyn Callesen of Keri Keri, the Crown Law Office even halted a private prosecution against Mr Callessen after evidence emerged that Mr Callessen and his former secretary Robin Morris had perverted the course of justice.

    The Ministry believes the privacy of...
    23-07-2016, 12:35 PM
  • Government funded escape artist Philip Smith found guilty
    by admin
    The murderer who embarrassed New Zealand law and border authorities by flying to Brazil while on temporary release from prison has been convicted for the audacious escape. Charges of escaping lawful custody and making a false statement to renew a passport have been added to Phillip John Smith's lengthy criminal record, along with murder, child sex abuse, kidnapping, tax fraud and arson. In an unusual legal procedure, a jury was chosen at the Auckland District Court today and the judge immedia...
    22-07-2016, 02:05 PM
Working...
X