No announcement yet.

Suspect Practices at New Zealand Supreme Court Raise Concerns


  • Suspect Practices at New Zealand Supreme Court Raise Concerns

    Inaccurate and incomplete public recordkeeping at the New Zealand Supreme Court is going unchallenged and unreported according to a new report on kiwisfirst.

    Most Kiwis are unaware the New Zealand Supreme Court does not record Registrar email on secret judgments of Guy and Slavich 15.8.15.pdf some judgments and does not allow Registrar refusal to access records Slavich.pdf public access to filings and submissions in appeals where the Court dismisses the applications. Of the “official” 199 applications determined last year, the Supreme Court allowed 22 to be determined on merits or question of law. The 199 does not include “off record” rulings. Nonetheless, only 11% of filings are accessible by custom. However, some filings and/or submissions in in this minority are often suppressed.

    Of the remaining 89%, the only “public record” is the Supreme Court judgment which rejected each application. Aside from the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement legislation, it is difficult to find an example of government appropriation with so little transparency. One opaque bill in Parliament; 89% opaque rulings in New Zealand’s highest court.

    To the unexperienced and uninformed, evidence of the New Zealand Supreme Court’s integrity is the absence of evidence to the contrary. For the learned lawyers who must bow to the Court on occasion and live with its caprices, patronage and fear preside. Neither exists by happenstance. Considerable effort is required to

    This lack of transparency is facilitating greater transgressions. Chief among these is the use of Supreme Court rulings to misrepresent law or facts being raised. As one recurrent example, twice in its young existence (Gregory v Gollan and Wenzel v R) the New Zealand Supreme Court rejected challenges to denial of jury trials on the ground any argument judges are not as fair as juries is untenable. However, when one reads the sequestered applications it becomes apparent this was not a ground of appeal in either application. Both appeals relied upon statutory rights – a relevant fact supplanted by red herrings in each judgment. Because the Supreme Court prevents access to filings, the Judges were keenly aware they could claim the applications said virtually anything.

    Of equal concern, rulings of New Zealand’s highest court are being issued by unrecorded, unreasoned and anonymous email Anonymous email judgment supreme court 2014.pdf… replete with a claim of legal privilege attached to the emails.

    The Supreme Court recently dismissed three challenges to their Registrar’s decision the Supreme Court is exempt from legislation such as the Access to Court Document Rules 2009 – without any judge addressing merits of the challenges. In April, Justice David Collins ruled the Supreme Court Registrar is immune from judicial review, before concluding no remedy in law may be available to challenge Registrar decisions. Collins added, "This may be a matter for Parliament or the Executive to visit. It is not a matter that is within (a Court's) power to address."

    Although it is evidently important to any democracy when judges claim a lay registrar's unlawful decisions are beyond their authority to correct, NZ mega-media conglomerate NZME. twice falsely reported these challenges for elementary transparency to be a relationship property fight over a first division lotto prize winning, complete with a close-up photograph of a lotto ticket. No provenance was given to the false reporting. A call to the Editor by the Court Applicant Malcolm Rabson produced an apology and a claim their reporting was government sourced, and correct if one went back to Rabson's first experience with the NZ courts.

    NZME. (New Zealand Media & Entertainment – don’t forget the ‘full stop’) no longer pretends by its name to safeguard the public’s interest in this democracy. It is all media and entertainment.

    Still, NZME. purports to shield 52 ‘news’ companies under its corporate umbrella in this country of 4 million. These cash-strapped shells cannot afford to cover in-depth news, cannot afford to be wrong and cannot afford to take on the NZ government. They increasingly spend what little money they have on lawyers who tell them what not to publish – not because the information is incorrect but because retribution for doing so will be fierce. If you doubt this, ask yourself one question: “Name one investigative news journalist in New Zealand?”.

    Then consider ever-smiling John Campbell. Hardly an investigative journalist, when his liberal bent graduated to John unwittingly asking too many embarrassing questions to a vengeful government, bye-bye John.

    It is no secret that the health of any democracy rests on an informed and engaged citizenry. This is why an independent and intrepid press is regarded as the best safeguard against autocracy and tyranny. Yet no ‘mainstream’ organisation is reporting these important facts. Note the word ‘news’ is not mentioned in describing NZ media. Therein lies the problem for New Zealand.

    Powerful players in New Zealand do not tolerate criticism and are accustomed to taking liberties. Unfortunately for the rest of us, geographical remoteness helps their ilk. Cash strapped ‘media’ companies are not sued by beached whales and it is these considerations that dictate ‘news’ reporting in New Zealand today. Bureaucratic whales do sue – and they quickly obtain injunctions prohibiting the media from reporting on the lawsuit as well. It is all one black hole. Sadly, because the death grip of the black hole extends beyond our shores and our closest neighbour Australia cannot be bothered reporting news within New Zealand, there is a huge obstacle to our collective fate improving in accessing important news. The singing cat and toast with an image of Jesus stories which replace investigations into government deception and corruption gradually undermine an informed democracy.
    Attached Files
      Posting comments is disabled.

    Latest Articles


    • Judge Goddard refuses to answer MPs' questions
      by admin
      The former New Zealand judge who headed a UK inquiry into child sexual abuse has said she will not appear before British MPs to answer questions about her time in charge. Dame Lowell Goddard said for her to be summoned would compromise the inquiry's "independence and integrity". She also hit out at "malicious, defamatory attacks" by the British media and said she was disappointed the government had not defended her. British MPs have asked the former head of the child sex abuse inquiry to expl...
      11-11-2016, 11:47 AM
    • Judge Lowell Goddard's epic fail
      by admin
      Dame Lowell Goddard, the New Zealand judge who resigned last week as chair of the £100 million (N$183.5m) Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA), did not leave her post voluntarily but was effectively fired. Dame Lowell, appointed by then-Home Secretary Theresa May just over a year ago, had already lost the confidence of senior staff and members of the inquiry panel, according to two well-placed legal sources. The Home Office has denied she was sacked, according to reports. After she ...
      09-08-2016, 10:07 AM
    • Sir Ngatata Love's lawyer claims agreement had no impact on Trust
      by admin
      Sir Ngatata Love's lawyer Colin Carruthers QC says the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) theory against his client is wrong, with a key agreement placing no financial cost on the Wellington Tenths Trust. The former leading Treaty of Waitangi negotiator and academic is on trial in the High Court at Wellington, accused of obtaining funds by deception, or alternatively of obtaining a secret commission.The charges relate to allegations that Love showed favour to Auckland property developer Redwood, and ...
      05-08-2016, 01:44 PM
    • Transport boss pleads guilty to corruption charges
      by admin
      The Serious Fraud Office says the guilty plea yesterday by an Auckland Council manager to corruption charges shows the dangers in not questioning a culture of gratuities. Barrie Kenneth James George, 69, this morning at the High Court at Auckland pleaded guilty to two charges of accepting bribes as a public official when he took gifts worth $103,580 between 2005 and 2012. The gifts included cash, and lavish overseas holidays for George and his family. SFO Director, Julie Read welcomed the guilty plea...
      04-08-2016, 09:40 AM
    • Identities of corrupt JP's stay secret
      by admin
      The identities of Justices of the Peace disciplined for incompetence, making false allegations or misusing their title for personal gain are being kept secret by the Ministry of Justice.In the case of the above JP Denis Selwyn Callesen of Keri Keri, the Crown Law Office even halted a private prosecution against Mr Callessen after evidence emerged that Mr Callessen and his former secretary Robin Morris had perverted the course of justice.

      The Ministry believes the privacy of...
      23-07-2016, 11:35 AM
    • Government funded escape artist Philip Smith found guilty
      by admin
      The murderer who embarrassed New Zealand law and border authorities by flying to Brazil while on temporary release from prison has been convicted for the audacious escape. Charges of escaping lawful custody and making a false statement to renew a passport have been added to Phillip John Smith's lengthy criminal record, along with murder, child sex abuse, kidnapping, tax fraud and arson. In an unusual legal procedure, a jury was chosen at the Auckland District Court today and the judge immedia...
      22-07-2016, 01:05 PM