Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Stasi" Law Society exposed

Collapse
X
Collapse
  •  

  • "Stasi" Law Society exposed

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Frank-1024x288.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	11.7 KB
ID:	24989

    Omens of threat to an ordered society, perceived or real, can provoke the most sensible citizens to willingly forfeit their freedoms. After 9-11, Americans paradoxically clamoured for new laws which limited their right to assembly and freedom from search and surveillance.

    To those who protested, the suspicion mounted over what they had to hide. Few things give more power to an autocracy than a war against a vague threat, and the gullibility of the masses escapes notice of few prone to abuse public trust of power.

    In New Zealand, as long as the buses run on schedule and crime was well hidden, people had no reason to complain the government was becoming more secretive and corrupt. But despite this apathy, and investigative journalism in NZ years ago suffering the same fate as the Moa, scandals each week are popping up in this country with the population of Toronto.

    It is proving impossible not to recognise New Zealand has a corruption problem despite the cultural taboo against exposing misfeasance by powerful individuals.

    While politicians are increasingly outed for apparent corruption, there remains a disparity between their treatment by the island nation's press and the stalwart bureaucrats who are much better placed to threaten and cajole. While Justice Minister Judith Collins' statements are being spell-checked by journos concerning who she had dinner with in China, a virtual feeding frenzy of corruption plays out each day within the Justice Ministry.

    Ironically, Ms Collins was making an effort to lift the veil of secrecy shrouding many judicial acts prior to her recent tribulations.

    One man who is trying to help Kiwis get a grip on the disparity is Auckland barrister Frank Deliu (pictured). He famously won a High Court review which exposed the Judicial Conduct Commissioner for sitting on complaints of judicial misconduct and has been keeping the government busy responding to United Nations human rights complaints. Last week he exposed the National Standards Committee Secretary of the New Zealand Law Society for unlawfully answering private inquiries from the Chief High Court Judge concerning an investigation another judge asked the NZLS to conduct into Dr Deliu for complaining about a third judge. In New Zealand, such charades are demonstrative of our unique brand of 'judicial independence'.

    Though the NZLS could not dispute the evidence Secretary Mary Ollivier had acted unlawfully, they did their best by neither confirming nor denying the charges in a " decision" which merely stated the Society decided "to take no further action in respect to the complaint"

    This is but one similarity the NZLS has with Stasi, the official state security service of the former East Germany. Another is the evidence which shows the NZLS is being used by judges as a hit squad to exact disguised punishment against their critics, with both the judges and the NZLS officials acting unlawfully (e.g. disclosure revealed that Ms Ollivier was one of four NZLS officials Chief High Court Judge Helen Winkelman sought ex parte communications with).

    The person in charge of professional legal standards being found to have acted unlawfully would be news in any law respecting country but it is doubtful you could find news of it anywhere but on kiwisfirst.

    More ominous threats exist within this secret regime. Earlier this year, in what many labelled a show trial staged by the NZLS - and which virtually no lawyers criticised - Barrister Evgeny Orlov was disbarred over an infamous row he had with then-high Court Judge Rhys Harrison. Harrison's errant denigration of Orlov was accepted as judicial comment. Orlov's criticisms of Harrison, which four witnesses sought to support but the tribunal refused to consider, were sufficient for the tribunal to pass sentence of economic capital punishment. Despite the high stakes, the judge was not allowed to be questioned and the tribunal's witness stated she could not remember whether the judge was disrespectful to Orlov but her memory is she likely would have remembered if he had been.


    The lay member on the panel dissented from the decision.


    The tactics leading up to the trial were perhaps more suspect. Discovery revealed the NZLS had been trolling kiwisfirst from at least December 2010 for information to open files on lawyers and even lay persons who were exposing actions of the New Zealand court system and Attorney General. Considering Attorney-General Finlayson preaches to lawyers who will listen that kiwisfirst publications are false and defamatory, the NZLS's reliance on kiwisfirst publications is, in the least, baffling.


    One upshot of the New Zealand regime is Judge Winkelmann's misconduct will never be questioned because exposing misdeeds by judges in New Zealand results in Stalinesque charges against the whistleblowing-lawyer for bringing the judiciary into disrepute.

    No media lawyer will approve their organisation run such allegations and evidence for fear of exposing themselves to attack as well as their employer. In 2010, emails briefly surfaced between former President of the New Zealand Bar Association James Farmer and retired Court of Appeal Judge Ted Thomas revealing an attempt to quell the conflict of interest scandal surrounding Supreme Court Justice Bill Wilson because of fear the scandal "could bring down (the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court) if probed".

    Despite these men certainly being in a position to know what constituted a legitimate threat to bring down the Chief Justice, no probe occurred and nothing more was reported.


    NZ Judges routinely issue judgments which declare judges must be exempt from the law in order to maintain their independence - as Justice Kit Toogood ruled in 2012 in granting the Judicial Conduct Commissioner's application striking out a judicial review against the Commissioner's refusal to conduct a preliminary examination of a judicial misconduct complaint.

    While Section 15 of the Judicial Conduct Commissioner and Judicial Panel Act states the Commissioner "must" do so, Toogood declared the purpose of the Act was to protect judicial independence, concluding the Commissioner's reading of a complaint amounts to a preliminary examination despite the Commissioner ruling he would not conduct a preliminary examination.


    Lawyers who care about what is happening are afraid to state the obvious in public; "An independent judiciary is one thing, while a wilful, capricious, unprincipled and tyrannical judiciary is another", as Australian High Court Justice Dyson Heydon brilliantly imparted to a NZLS seminar in 2008.


    It should not be surprising that NZ Judges interpret laws in a manner most beneficial to their interests. But it is safe to state that when the President of the NZ Bar Association seeks to cover up judicial misconduct, the Law Society acts on private requests of judges to prosecute because the lawyer dared to lay a complaint against a fellow judge, and the press fails to report it, the rule of law is being lost.

    A vigilant, intrepid press and a vibrant independent bar have always been essential protections against despotism by judicial officers in law-respecting democracies. New Zealand jurists have turned this historical lesson on its head, put lipstick on the ass and show no mercy for citizens who refuse to kiss it.

    Credit:Kiwisfirst

    • John "Brockovich"
      #7
      John "Brockovich" commented
      Editing a comment
      Originally posted by Q. C.
      For the avoidance of doubt, on the Legal Complaints Review Officer, the Act states he must not be a lawyer.

      Therefore he is absolutely independent in the publics and MP's eyes.

      Unfortunately, when our brilliant MP's passed the Act they did not notice that the lawyers who drafted the Act inserted in s. 4 a definition of a lawyer. A Lawyers is defined as someone who has a practice certificate.

      So all lawyers who have become Legal Complaints Review Officers since the Act can into effect were not lawyers, as they resigned their practice certificates just before being appointed. The first LCRO, Mr. Webb, before resigning as LCRO reapplied for his Practice Certificate and received it as soon as he resigned.

      The above situation is called the highest standard of ethics, utmost integrity and obvious independence by the Law Society and its members.

      In simply terms screw Parliament and the public, we are protected by the Act we wrote to fleece and abuse the public in whatever way we regularly choose.
      A Question: As the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 is administered by the Ministry of Justice and Judith Collins is the Minister, a Lawyer and an MP, and must know that all previous LCRO's were lawyers before they resigned to become LCRO's; is it because of her conflict of interests as a Lawyer and Minister that she knows of this yet has not approached Parliament to correct the Act so as the Law Society cannot endorse it Members appointment to the LCRO position in breach of the intentions of the Act and Parliament?

      Will any journalist ask that question of the Justice Minister on her perceived or actual conflict of interest in this area!

    • Q. C.
      #8
      Q. C. commented
      Editing a comment
      Originally posted by John "Brockovich"
      A Question: As the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 is administered by the Ministry of Justice and Judith Collins is the Minister, a Lawyer and an MP, and must know that all previous LCRO's were lawyers before they resigned to become LCRO's; is it because of her conflict of interests as a Lawyer and Minister that she knows of this yet has not approached Parliament to correct the Act so as the Law Society cannot endorse it Members appointment to the LCRO position in breach of the intentions of the Act and Parliament?

      Will any journalist ask that question of the Justice Minister on her perceived or actual conflict of interest in this area!
      Footnote: Under s. 190 of the Act "The Legal Complaints Review Officer is to be appointed by the Minister, after consultation with the NZ Law Society..." , ie Judith Collins and her predecessors who were all lawyers.

    • John "Brockovich"
      #9
      John "Brockovich" commented
      Editing a comment
      Originally posted by Q. C.
      Footnote: Under s. 190 of the Act "The Legal Complaints Review Officer is to be appointed by the Minister, after consultation with the NZ Law Society..." , ie Judith Collins and her predecessors who were all lawyers.
      SECOND QUESTION: In integrity v integrity (that is Collins v the Law Society); who has the least integrity or is it so insignificant that it cannot be measured?
    Posting comments is disabled.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • Judge Goddard refuses to answer MPs' questions
    by admin
    The former New Zealand judge who headed a UK inquiry into child sexual abuse has said she will not appear before British MPs to answer questions about her time in charge. Dame Lowell Goddard said for her to be summoned would compromise the inquiry's "independence and integrity". She also hit out at "malicious, defamatory attacks" by the British media and said she was disappointed the government had not defended her. British MPs have asked the former head of the child sex abuse inquiry to expl...
    11-11-2016, 12:47 PM
  • Judge Lowell Goddard's epic fail
    by admin
    Dame Lowell Goddard, the New Zealand judge who resigned last week as chair of the 100 million (N$183.5m) Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA), did not leave her post voluntarily but was effectively fired. Dame Lowell, appointed by then-Home Secretary Theresa May just over a year ago, had already lost the confidence of senior staff and members of the inquiry panel, according to two well-placed legal sources. The Home Office has denied she was sacked, according to reports. After she ...
    09-08-2016, 11:07 AM
  • Sir Ngatata Love's lawyer claims agreement had no impact on Trust
    by admin
    Sir Ngatata Love's lawyer Colin Carruthers QC says the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) theory against his client is wrong, with a key agreement placing no financial cost on the Wellington Tenths Trust. The former leading Treaty of Waitangi negotiator and academic is on trial in the High Court at Wellington, accused of obtaining funds by deception, or alternatively of obtaining a secret commission.The charges relate to allegations that Love showed favour to Auckland property developer Redwood, and ...
    05-08-2016, 02:44 PM
  • Transport boss pleads guilty to corruption charges
    by admin
    The Serious Fraud Office says the guilty plea yesterday by an Auckland Council manager to corruption charges shows the dangers in not questioning a culture of gratuities. Barrie Kenneth James George, 69, this morning at the High Court at Auckland pleaded guilty to two charges of accepting bribes as a public official when he took gifts worth $103,580 between 2005 and 2012. The gifts included cash, and lavish overseas holidays for George and his family. SFO Director, Julie Read welcomed the guilty plea...
    04-08-2016, 10:40 AM
  • Identities of corrupt JP's stay secret
    by admin
    The identities of Justices of the Peace disciplined for incompetence, making false allegations or misusing their title for personal gain are being kept secret by the Ministry of Justice.In the case of the above JP Denis Selwyn Callesen of Keri Keri, the Crown Law Office even halted a private prosecution against Mr Callessen after evidence emerged that Mr Callessen and his former secretary Robin Morris had perverted the course of justice.

    The Ministry believes the privacy of...
    23-07-2016, 12:35 PM
  • Government funded escape artist Philip Smith found guilty
    by admin
    The murderer who embarrassed New Zealand law and border authorities by flying to Brazil while on temporary release from prison has been convicted for the audacious escape. Charges of escaping lawful custody and making a false statement to renew a passport have been added to Phillip John Smith's lengthy criminal record, along with murder, child sex abuse, kidnapping, tax fraud and arson. In an unusual legal procedure, a jury was chosen at the Auckland District Court today and the judge immedia...
    22-07-2016, 02:05 PM
Working...
X