No announcement yet.

Fathers suffered under old Family Court rules


  • Fathers suffer under old Family Court rules

    Click image for larger version

Name:	FamilyCourt$ 2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	42.1 KB
ID:	24884
    Planned reforms to the Family Court need to focus on the right issues, argues men's rights advocate Craig Jackson.

    Powerful women's domestic violence lobby groups have already spoken out strongly about changes to the domestic violence legislation which are part and parcel of a number of other far-reaching changes to our Family Court. These include the intended repeal of clause 60, a repeal many would welcome as it is repugnant to natural justice.

    At present, the clause allows the female partner - most usually - on a "without notice" basis to apply for, and often be granted, a Domestic Protection Order without any evidence needing to be produced to demonstrate that the fears for her safety and for her children's safety are in fact true, particularly if psychological violence is alleged, the application is often accompanied by an application for an ex parte sole parenting order.

    This is also often granted on the assumption that this is in the best interests of the mother, which are equated with the best interests of the children and it is not uncommon for the mother and the children to relocate to another town, further sabotaging the father's case for a shared parenting arrangement.

    Not infrequently the mother may also allege that the father has molested or sexually abused his children, which can be seen as another powerful but rarely valid strategy to ensure that, with the support of the Family Court, she can retain the primary care of her children irrespective of her capabilities and qualities as a parent. For today's fathers who are much more involved in their children's upbringing, separation from his children will be more traumatic than fathers of previous generations, while some fathers may actually have a stronger emotional bond with their children than the mother.

    While the "sympathy" of the court more often goes to the solo mother with a physically, psychologically and now economically abusive ex-partner, studies of male suicide patterns show that men are eight or nine times more likely to commit suicide after a marital or relationship breakdown than at any other time in their lives.

    So shouldn't our sympathies be extended to both parties and to the children still caught up over the entire 32-year history of the Family Court in adversarial legal battles in which there should be no winners and no losers in this complex area of disintegrating family relationships?

    Another change likely to be resisted by the women's domestic violence groups is the replacement of the former "one size fits all" anger management and non-violence programmes.
    The new system to be run by the proposed Family Dispute Resolution Service will involve both parents along with - depending on their age and maturity - the children as parenting arrangements in the post- separation phase are negotiated. Fathers groups are likely to welcome this change.

    The Government rightly regards the true dynamics of domestic violence as an important issue and has instructed the Parliamentary Select Committee hearing submissions on the bill to focus on it.

    * Craig Jackson is a registered psychologist and long-standing advocate for fathers and families caught up in the Family Court.

    • Thane
      Thane commented
      Editing a comment
      Does anyone actually know?

      While there will doubtless be examples of the kinds of cases cited, no-one really knows what is happening behind the veil of silence that cloaks the Family Court. We know how many cases go through the Family Court but that seems to be about all we know. Craig Jackson claims that women 'often' allege violence or abuse - how often? And how many times do fathers claim Parental Alienation as an excuse to cover up that abuse? How often do judges rule for a reversal of care? How often does one rich parent trot out a succession of 'experts' and child psychologists as they grind the other parent of the child they are supposed to love into financial and emotional oblivion? How long do cases take to be resolved when experts are involved? Is the average going up or down? Are there any trends with particular judges or courts? The fact is - we simply do not know. How can we fix the system if we do not even know the extent to which it is broken?
      Last edited by Thane; 26-03-2013, 03:10 PM.
    Posting comments is disabled.

Latest Articles


  • Judge Goddard refuses to answer MPs' questions
    by admin
    The former New Zealand judge who headed a UK inquiry into child sexual abuse has said she will not appear before British MPs to answer questions about her time in charge. Dame Lowell Goddard said for her to be summoned would compromise the inquiry's "independence and integrity". She also hit out at "malicious, defamatory attacks" by the British media and said she was disappointed the government had not defended her. British MPs have asked the former head of the child sex abuse inquiry to expl...
    11-11-2016, 11:47 AM
  • Judge Lowell Goddard's epic fail
    by admin
    Dame Lowell Goddard, the New Zealand judge who resigned last week as chair of the 100 million (N$183.5m) Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA), did not leave her post voluntarily but was effectively fired. Dame Lowell, appointed by then-Home Secretary Theresa May just over a year ago, had already lost the confidence of senior staff and members of the inquiry panel, according to two well-placed legal sources. The Home Office has denied she was sacked, according to reports. After she ...
    09-08-2016, 10:07 AM
  • Sir Ngatata Love's lawyer claims agreement had no impact on Trust
    by admin
    Sir Ngatata Love's lawyer Colin Carruthers QC says the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) theory against his client is wrong, with a key agreement placing no financial cost on the Wellington Tenths Trust. The former leading Treaty of Waitangi negotiator and academic is on trial in the High Court at Wellington, accused of obtaining funds by deception, or alternatively of obtaining a secret commission.The charges relate to allegations that Love showed favour to Auckland property developer Redwood, and ...
    05-08-2016, 01:44 PM
  • Transport boss pleads guilty to corruption charges
    by admin
    The Serious Fraud Office says the guilty plea yesterday by an Auckland Council manager to corruption charges shows the dangers in not questioning a culture of gratuities. Barrie Kenneth James George, 69, this morning at the High Court at Auckland pleaded guilty to two charges of accepting bribes as a public official when he took gifts worth $103,580 between 2005 and 2012. The gifts included cash, and lavish overseas holidays for George and his family. SFO Director, Julie Read welcomed the guilty plea...
    04-08-2016, 09:40 AM
  • Identities of corrupt JP's stay secret
    by admin
    The identities of Justices of the Peace disciplined for incompetence, making false allegations or misusing their title for personal gain are being kept secret by the Ministry of Justice.In the case of the above JP Denis Selwyn Callesen of Keri Keri, the Crown Law Office even halted a private prosecution against Mr Callessen after evidence emerged that Mr Callessen and his former secretary Robin Morris had perverted the course of justice.

    The Ministry believes the privacy of...
    23-07-2016, 11:35 AM
  • Government funded escape artist Philip Smith found guilty
    by admin
    The murderer who embarrassed New Zealand law and border authorities by flying to Brazil while on temporary release from prison has been convicted for the audacious escape. Charges of escaping lawful custody and making a false statement to renew a passport have been added to Phillip John Smith's lengthy criminal record, along with murder, child sex abuse, kidnapping, tax fraud and arson. In an unusual legal procedure, a jury was chosen at the Auckland District Court today and the judge immedia...
    22-07-2016, 01:05 PM